Why (almost) Everything is Context
Imagine running 100m in 13.47 seconds
Look, I get it. You're unimpressed. I can practically hear the skepticism. 'Local jog?'. 'Amateur hour at the community track?'. 'My grandma could do better.' 'I could do that after a six-pack.'! 'Is he bragging?' you ask.

But here’s the twist: 13.47 seconds is a world record — for a 70-year-old man. And it’s only 0.01 seconds slower than the world record for a 7-year-old. Same number, radically different meaning.
That’s the point. Context - the thing we routinely forget - changes everything. This essay looks at why we misinterpret reality so consistently. My claim is simple: when we ignore context, our judgments wobble, our decisions falter, and most advice collapses into noise. Meaning is never free-floating; it’s always anchored to the frame around it. Remove the frame and the conclusion becomes incoherent. The statistics alone should make this obvious, and we’ll return to them later.
Yet a surprising number of self-development writers insist on context-free wisdom. Their binary formulas — three steps to clarity, four pillars of happiness, stop doing X forever — are held together by confidence, not logic. Social media amplifies this absolutism; popular books reinforce it. Life is more complex, which is why context isn’t optional. It’s the whole architecture.
Responses